Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than Galaxy J6, getting an 80 score against 73.7. The Google Pixel 3 is a a little lighter and a little thinner device than the Galaxy J6, even when they were released only 5 months apart. Google Pixel 3 features a sharper display than Galaxy J6, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a better count of pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel 3 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy J6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy J6 has a bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy J6 features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh. Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy J6, because although it has a camera in the back with less megapixels, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures, a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.