Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy J6's 73.7 global score. The Google Pixel 3 XL body is a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy J6, and both were released with only a few months difference. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a bit larger display, way more pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Galaxy J6 counts with a better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy J6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy J6, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low light situations, a lot higher video definition and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy J6, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.