Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is better than Galaxy J6's 73.7 global score. The Google Pixel 4 design has the same thickness than the Galaxy J6, but it's just a bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 features a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy J6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 features a much better looking display than Galaxy J6, because it has a way higher screen pixel density, a little bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px. Samsung Galaxy J6 features a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy J6 has just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy J6, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.