Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is much better than Galaxy J6's overall score of 73.7. Google Pixel 4 XL is a much heavier device than Galaxy J6, but both are 0.32inches thick. Google Pixel 4 XL has a superior processing power than Galaxy J6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a lot greater pixel quantity per inch in the display, a little larger screen and a much better 1440 x 3040px resolution. Galaxy J6 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Google Pixel 4 XL takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy J6, because although it has a less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution, a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy J6, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.