Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Galaxy J6, having an 89 score against 73.7. Google Pixel 5 is a newer phone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy J6. Google Pixel 5 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a little bit larger display, a higher display pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Google Pixel 5 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 5 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy J6, because although it has a worse 12.2 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light situations, a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.