Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy J6, getting a overall score of 82.5 against 73.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has the previous 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG V30S ThinQ design is just a bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the Galaxy J6, and both of them were released with only a couple months difference.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy J6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ has a brighter screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a way better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, a way higher display pixel density and a little larger screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J6, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and a more megapixels camera.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy J6, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.