Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J6's general score of 73.7. The LG V35 ThinQ body is just a little bit heavier but a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J6, and they were only released with a couple months difference. LG V35 ThinQ features a better CPU than Galaxy J6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a quite larger display, a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a much better display pixels density. LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J6, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better camera than Galaxy J6, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor offering a worse image quality, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a camera in the back with a higher resolution and a larger aperture. LG V35 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.