Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy J6, having an 81.2 score against 73.7. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG V40 ThinQ's design is just a little bit heavier but a little thinner than Galaxy J6, and both of them were only released with a few months difference.
LG V40 ThinQ has a faster processor than Galaxy J6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a much better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little larger display.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J6, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy J6, because it has a 10 percent greater battery size.
LG V40 ThinQ captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy J6, because although it has a lesser MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photos, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much larger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.