Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J6, having a global score of 78.5 against 73.7. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion design is much newer and just a bit thinner, but also a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J6. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a way better screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a larger screen, a better pixel density and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy J6 has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy J6, because it has a much higher video quality, a much larger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy J6, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.