Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is much better than Galaxy J6, with an 83.4 score against 73.7. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's body is noticeably newer than Galaxy J6's, although it's notably heavier and a little thicker. These phones work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an older 13 version and Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy J6 features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a bigger display, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a higher pixels amount per display inch.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy J6, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a 53% larger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a much more megapixels back camera, a way higher video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.