Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J6's 73.7 general score. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a somewhat heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy J6, but both of them are 0.32inches thick. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy J6 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 9 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a greater pixel count per inch of screen, a larger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy J6, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution, a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.