Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J6's 73.7 score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much newer than the Samsung Galaxy J6, it is a lot heavier and just a little bit thicker.
Galaxy J6 features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 9 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better looking display than Galaxy J6, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bigger display and a greater pixel number in each inch of screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J6, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy J6, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy J6, because it has a way better video quality, a bigger camera aperture, a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.