Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 is a little bit better than the Galaxy J6, having a 77.6 score against 73.7. Both devices in this review have the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Even though the Moto Z3 and Galaxy J6 were only released with a couple months difference, the Moto Z3 design is a bit heavier but somewhat thinner than Galaxy J6.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features just a little better processing power than Galaxy J6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has more RAM. Moto Z3 features a brighter screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160px, a greater pixels density and a quite larger display.
The Motorola Moto Z3 takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy J6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and videos in low light environments and a lesser mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a much better video resolution.
Moto Z3 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J6, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage. Moto Z3's battery life is very similar to the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy J6.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.