Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Samsung Galaxy J6, having an 87 score against 73.7. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola razr (2020) is a notably newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J6, although it is heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger screen and a higher 876 x 2142px resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy J6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy J6, because it has a camera with lot more mega pixels, a lot higher (4K) video quality, a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy J6 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.