Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a score of 76.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy J6's 73.7 general score. Nubia Red Magic 5S's body is notably newer than the Galaxy J6's, although it's thicker and much heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but nubia Red Magic 5S has 10 version and Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a sharper screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a higher screen density, a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S features more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy J6, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a superior performance than Galaxy J6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments and a way larger sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy J6, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.