Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than Samsung Galaxy J6, having an 83.8 score against 73.7. Even though the Galaxy A50 is a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J6, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. The Galaxy A50 features a much better screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a little bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J6, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy J6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy J6, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.