Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 is slightly better than Galaxy J6, getting a general score of 76.9 against 73.7. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A70 has older 10 version while Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a newer and just a little thinner phone than the Galaxy J6, but it's also heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy J6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 3 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a larger screen and a higher amount of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy J6 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos, they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition.
The Galaxy A70 has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J6, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.