Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy J6's 73.7 global score. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy J6, but it's much heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better CPU than Galaxy J6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a way higher pixels amount per screen inch and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy J6, because it has a way higher video quality, a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low light environments and a much bigger sensor. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy J6, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy J6, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.