Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is way better than Samsung Galaxy J6, having an 89 score against 73.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy J6, it's a little bit thinner and newer. Galaxy Note10 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a little larger screen, a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J6, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a better performing processor than Galaxy J6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note10 has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy Note10 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J6, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a way larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.