Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Galaxy J6, getting a global score of 98 against 73.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than the Galaxy J6, it's just a little thicker and extremely heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy J6, because it has a lot better pixel count per screen inch, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a larger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J6, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy J6, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a much larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.