Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-22 | -- |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.43 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is better than the Galaxy J6's 73.7 general score. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a extremely thinner and a lot lighter device than the Galaxy J6.
The Samsung Galaxy J6 has a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S25 features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a greater pixel density, a little bigger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger aperture, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution. The Galaxy S25 counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy J6, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S25 counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy J6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.