Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.88 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than Galaxy J6's overall score of 73.7. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Galaxy J6 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is newer than the Galaxy J6's, although it's somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has a better screen density, a quite larger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J6, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy J6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy J6, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bigger aperture and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy J6, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.