Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2015-10-27 |
| 5.96 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.60 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 240.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, having a global score of 74.8 against 69. Motorola DROID Turbo 2's body is older, a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T. The Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T has a bit better CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores (although slower).
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has an incredibly better display than Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a much better pixel density. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because it has a way higher video definition and a much higher resolution back camera.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 48 GB more internal storage. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.