Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 69 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.96 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is better than the Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, getting an 80.7 score against 69. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is notably older and just a little heavier than the Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, it's body is still a little thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also has 1 GB more RAM memory and an extra graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because it has a quite larger display, a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy Note 3 features a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 64 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because it has a much more MP back-facing camera and a way higher video resolution. The Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 costs a bit more than the Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.