Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-07-01 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is better than Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 overall score. The Apple iPhone XR construction is newer than the Galaxy J7 (2017)'s, but it's a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. IPhone XR has a better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XR has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a little bit worse screen pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 828 x 1792px, it also counts with a quite larger display. The iPhone XR counts with a slightly better storage for applications and games than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has greater battery life than iPhone XR, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh. IPhone XR has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a back camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.