Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-07-01 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy J7 (2017)'s score of 73.5. The Google Pixel body is notably lighter but just a bit thicker than the Galaxy J7 (2017), and both were released with only a couple of months difference. The Google Pixel features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with more RAM.
Google Pixel counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, the Google Pixel also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density. The Google Pixel has a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a back camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Google Pixel features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy J7 (2017) counts with superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 30% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.