Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-07-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), having a global score of 80 against 73.5. Google Pixel 3 is a lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), but both of them have the same thickness. Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a quite better screen pixel density and a bit higher 1080 x 2160 resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos and a less megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) counts with superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 23 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.