Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)'s general score of 73.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer and a bit lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), although it is just a bit thicker.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a just a bit better pixels density, a little bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a lesser megapixels back facing camera, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.