Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-07-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot better than Galaxy J7 (2017), with an 89 score against 73.5. Google Pixel 5's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy J7 (2017), but it is somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a little bit better pixels amount per inch of display, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit larger screen.
The Google Pixel 5 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.