Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-07-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)'s global score of 73.5. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is newer, lighter and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017). The LG V35 ThinQ has a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a little larger display and a higher pixels amount in each inch of display.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has 48 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy J7 (2017) has a little longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a back-facing camera with a better 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.