Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is much better than Galaxy J7 (2017)'s global score of 73.5. These devices have Android OS, but Motorola edge has the previous 10 version while Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola edge's construction is newer, but thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy J7 (2017).
The Motorola edge counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Motorola edge counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola edge also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola edge shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a camera with lot more megapixels. The Motorola edge has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola edge counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.