Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 12 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is better than Galaxy J7 (2017), getting an 84.7 score against 73.5. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge (2022) has 12 version while Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge (2022)'s body is way newer and a little bit lighter, but also just a bit thicker than the Galaxy J7 (2017).
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen. Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge (2022) captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in low light environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.