Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 13 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), getting a score of 83.4 against 73.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a much newer phone than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), but it's just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a better display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy J7 (2017) features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 50 MP resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has improved battery performance than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 28% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.