Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is much better than the Galaxy J7 (2017), with a overall score of 81.9 against 73.5. These phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an older 14 version while Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is notably newer and a little bit lighter than the Galaxy J7 (2017)'s, but it is a bit thicker.
The Galaxy J7 (2017) features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much sharper screen than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a better 1256 x 2760px resolution, a larger screen and a little higher display density.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.