Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 (2017)'s global score of 73.5. These phones have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the older 14 version and Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's design is extremely newer than Galaxy J7 (2017)'s, although it is just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a larger aperture, a way more mega pixels back camera and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.