Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 general score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer phone than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), although it's just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.