Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-07-01 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 general score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto Z Force has the previous 7.0 Nougat version while Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Moto Z Force is an older phone than Galaxy J7 (2017), but it's just a little lighter and a little bit thinner anyway.
Moto Z Force counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with more RAM memory. Moto Z Force features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a display with the same size, the Moto Z Force also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per screen inch.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 48 GB more internal storage. The Moto Z Force shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a camera with much more megapixels and a lot higher (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy J7 (2017) has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 3600mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.