Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is better than the Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 score. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version while Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola razr (2020)'s body has the same thickness than Galaxy J7 (2017), but it is a little bit heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit better performance than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM. Galaxy J7 (2017) and Motorola razr (2020) count with very similar screens, because although the Motorola razr (2020) has a bit worse 876 x 2142 resolution and a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Motorola razr (2020) captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a camera with lot more megapixels and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy J7 (2017) features greater battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.