Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-07-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is way better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), having a score of 90.7 against 73.5. Even though the Galaxy A52 is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), it is a little heavier and just a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a larger display. Galaxy A52 has a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP and a way higher video quality.
Galaxy A52 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A52 has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.