Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 general score. These devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy A52s design is way newer than the Galaxy J7 (2017)'s, although it's a little thicker and a bit heavier.
The Galaxy A52s features a bit sharper display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a bigger screen, a little more pixels per inch of display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit better processor than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a way better camera than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52s features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.