Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a global score of 76.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy J7 (2017)'s overall score of 73.5. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version while Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A70's design has the same thickness than Galaxy J7 (2017), but it's just a bit heavier.
The Galaxy A70 features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy A70 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has 3 GB more RAM.
Galaxy J7 (2017) features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video quality and a F1.7 aperture. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.