Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-07-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Galaxy J7 (2017), with a 90.8 score against 73.5. Even though Galaxy Note 20 is noticeably newer than Galaxy J7 (2017), it is a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a quite worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a superior processor than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 5 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 3600mAh. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos and a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.