Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is incredibly newer, but just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy J7 (2017). Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a larger screen and a little higher pixel number in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has better battery performance than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.