Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), having an 81.2 score against 73.5. Even though Galaxy Note 3 is extremely older and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), it's design is still a little bit lighter. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a little better processing power than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a better screen than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, and they both have an equal 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 192 GB smaller, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy J7 (2017) has a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.