Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-07-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is way better than the Galaxy J7 (2017), having a overall score of 89 against 73.5. Galaxy Note10 is a just a little lighter cellphone than Galaxy J7 (2017), but they have the same thickness. The Galaxy Note10 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit larger display.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note10 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos and a lot higher video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy J7 (2017) has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 3600mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.