Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-01 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 (2017), with a overall score of 88.3 against 73.5. These devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S10 construction has the same thickness than Galaxy J7 (2017), but it's lighter.
Galaxy S10 counts with a better performing processing unit than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 features a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a better display density, a way better 1440 x 3040px resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy S10 has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB and 112 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy J7 (2017) counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.