Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-01 | -- |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.38 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), getting an 82.6 score against 73.5. Galaxy S25 is a notably lighter and notably thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017). Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S25 features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a just a bit better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S25 features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy J7 (2017) counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy S25 features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has an 11% more battery size. Galaxy S25 has a greater camera than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way more MP back camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.