Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), having an 81 score against 73.5. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), it is somewhat heavier and way thicker. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a bit larger display, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Galaxy XCover Pro features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.