Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much newer and a little bit thinner device than the Galaxy J7 (2017), although it's also a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a quite better screen density and a bigger display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 5 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.