Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-01 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is better than the Galaxy J7 (2017), having an 82.7 score against 73.5. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro body is newer, but thicker and a bit heavier than the Galaxy J7 (2017). Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has 10 version and Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little better pixel density and a larger display. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a lot more MP back-facing camera. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.